摘要: |
风云四号(FY4)气象卫星是我国第二代静止气象卫星,FY4B 云顶温度、云顶高度和云顶压强的反演算法与 FY4A相同,为了方便用户更好地应用 FY4B云顶产品,本文利用美国 EOS/MODIS极轨气象卫星和日本第二代静止气象卫星 Himawari-8云产品检验 FY4A 和 FY4B反演的云顶产品精度的一致性,结果表明,FY4B云顶产品与 FY4A具有很好的一致性,其中 B星多层云的较大误差主要是由于云分类将卷云错判成了多层云所致。从全样本的检验结果可以看出 FY4B云顶参数产品的精度与 FY4A 精度大体相当,两者的差异主要来自于通道光谱特征的改变、定标精度及所用的辐射传输模式的不同。 |
关键词: FY4 云顶温度 云顶高度 云顶压强 精度检验 |
DOI:10.16032/j.issn.1004-4965.2024.035 |
分类号: |
基金项目: |
|
Consistency of the Accuracy of FY-4B and FY-4A Cloud Top Products |
ZHANG Miao, XU Na, CHEN Lin, LIU Jian, YANG Changjun
|
Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellites/FengYun Meteorological Satellite Innovation Center (FY-MSIC)/National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
|
Abstract: |
The FengYun-4 (FY-4) meteorological satellite is the second generation of China’s geostationary meteorological satellite. FY-4B satellite utilizes identical algorithms as its predecessor, FY-4A, for retrieving cloud top temperature, height, and pressure. To facilitate the application of FY-4B cloud top products, this paper evaluated the consistency of the accuracy of the cloud top retrievals from FY-4A and FY-4B, and compared them with those from the EOS/MODIS polar-orbiting meteorological satellite of the United States and Himawari-8, Japan’s second-generation geostationary meteorological satellite. The results show that the cloud top retrievals from FY-4B exhibited good consistency with those from FY-4A. The larger error in FY-4B’s classification of multi-layer clouds mainly arose from the misclassification of cirrus clouds into multi-layer clouds. The validation results of the whole sample show that the accuracy of FY-4B cloud top retrievals is consistent with that of FY-4A. The discrepancies between them are primarily attributed to the variations in channel spectral characteristics, calibration accuracy, and the difference in the radiative transfer model used. |
Key words: FY-4 cloud-top temperature cloud-top height cloud-top pressure accuracy validation |